检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹冰雪 李瑾[1] CAO Bing-xue;LI Jin(Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture,Beijing 100097,China)
机构地区:[1]北京农业信息技术研究中心
出 处:《华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第6期55-69,共15页Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:北京市社会科学基金重点项目(17XCA002)
摘 要:基于2018年京津冀蔬菜种植户调查数据,采用OLS、QR与3SLS法分析了信息化影响农民增收的信息要素差异与个人禀赋差异。研究结果表明,就整体而言,信息基础投入有增收效应,信息技术采纳没有增收效应,且二者没有交互作用。就不同收入阶层农户而言,信息基础投入与信息技术采纳对高农业收入农户均有增收效应,但二者存在替代效应;信息基础投入对低农业收入农户没有增收效应,信息技术采纳则有减收效应,但二者存在互补效应。相较于物质资本或人力资本匮乏的农户,物质资本或人力资本丰富的农户信息基础投入与信息技术采纳的增收效应更为明显。Based on the survey data of vegetable growers in Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei in 2018,this paper uses OLS,QR and 3 SLS to analyze the impact of informatization on farmers’income in different information elements and personal endowment.The results show that as a whole,the information infrastructure input has an Income-increasing effect,the information technology adoption has no Income-increasing effect,and the two have no interaction.But for different income classes,the information infrastructure input and information technology adoption have an Income-increasing effect but a substitution relationship in high income class,while the information infrastructure input and information technology adoption have no Income-increasing effect or Income-decreasing effect respectively but a complementary relationship in low income class.Further,compared with the farmers lacking in material capital or human capital,the information infrastructure input and information technology adoption have more obvious Income-increasing effect on the farmers rich in material capital or human capital.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222