检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖锬 林超禄[1] 钟德文 XIAO Tan;LIN Chaolu;ZHONG Dewen(The First Hospital of Longyan City, Longyan 364000, China)
机构地区:[1]龙岩市第一医院
出 处:《中外医学研究》2019年第28期129-131,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:对比分析肾结石患者治疗中运用输尿管软镜及经皮肾镜碎石术的临床效果及其系统评价。方法:选取笔者所在医院2016年3月-2019年1月收治的110例肾结石患者,按照不同治疗方法将其分为输尿管软镜组与经皮肾镜组,各55例。分别选择经输尿管软镜碎石术、经皮肾镜碎石术治疗,比较两组临床效果。结果:输尿管软镜组术中出血量明显少于经皮肾镜组,但手术时间明显长于经皮肾镜组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在对直径≤2.0 cm的肾结石患者进行治疗时,两组清石率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在对直径>2.0 cm的肾结石患者进行治疗时,经皮肾镜组清石率明显高于输尿管软镜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。输尿管软镜组术后并发症发生率明显低于经皮肾镜组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在对直径≤2.0 cm肾结石患者进行治疗时,可以将经输尿管软镜碎石术作为首选治疗方案;在治疗直径>2.0 cm肾结石患者时,则可以选择经皮肾镜碎石术治疗。Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effect of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of of patients with renal calculi and its systematic evaluation. Method: A total of 110 cases of renal calculi admitted in our hospital from March 2016 to January 2019 were selected and divided into the flexible ureteroscopy group and the percutaneous nephroscopy group according to different treatment method,with 55 cases in each group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Result: The amount of bleeding in the flexible ureteroscopy group was significantly less than that in the percutaneous nephroscopy group, but the operation time was significantly longer than that in the percutaneous nephroscopy group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the treatment of patients with renal calculi ≤2.0 cm in diameter, there was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The stone clearance rate of the percutaneous nephroscopy group was significantly higher than that of flexible ureteroscope group in the treatment of patients with renal calculi >2.0 cm in diameter, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the flexible ureteroscopy group was significantly lower than that in the percutaneous nephroscopy group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Transureteral flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy is the first choice for the treatment of of patients with renal calculi ≤2.0 cm in diameter, and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy can be used for the treatment of patients with renal calculi >2.0 cm in diameter.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3