还原"梁陈方案"的历史本色——以梁思成、林徽因和陈占祥合著的一篇评论为中心  

Restoring the Historical Facts of Liang-Chen Plan: A Commentary by Liang Sicheng, Lin Huiyin and Chen Zhanxiang

作　　者：李浩[1] LI Hao

机构地区：[1]中国城市规划设计研究院邹德慈院士工作室

出　　处：《城市规划学刊》2019年第5期110-117,共8页Urban Planning Forum

基　　金：国家自然科学軽面上资助项目"城乡规划理论思想的源起、流变及实践响应机制研究”(批准号:51478439);住房和城乡建设部科学技术项目“中国当代城市规划科学史(第二期)”(项目编号:2017-R2-005);中国城市规划设计研究院科技创新基金资助重点项目“城市规划口述历史(第二期)”(项目编号:C-201701).

摘　　要：针对中国当代城市规划史上著名的"梁陈方案"事件,以新发现的一篇由梁思成、林徽因和陈占祥合著的评论文章《对于巴兰尼克夫先生所建议的北京市将来发展计划时几个问题》为中心,对梁思成等与苏联专家巴兰尼克夫关于北京城市规划的共识与分歧进行了讨论,澄清了诸多历史误会。梁思成等与苏联专家在北京工业发展、城市人口限制发展以及城市功能分区等方面存在共识;梁思成等对苏联专家报告中的郊区人口计算问题、工业人口规模及工业用地计算问题、住宅区远近问题提出了一些意见,但却并非重大的规划原则问题,关于城墙存废问题则不在争论的范畴。梁思成等对苏联专家报告的意见,集中反映在中央行政区规划问题上,亦即"梁陈方案"的主要内容及规划思想。In view of the famous "Liang-Chen Plan" event in the history of modem urban planning in China, a newly discovered commentary article entitled "Several Issues on the Future Development Plan of Beijing proposed by Mr. Baranikov", co-authored by Liang Sicheng, Lin Huiyin and Chen Zhanxiang, clarifies many historical misunderstandings by revealing the consensus and divergence between Liang Sicheng and colleagues and Soviet experts headed by Baranikov on Beijing's urban planning. Liang Sicheng and Soviet experts shared views on s*Beijing industrial development, restriction of urban population and urban functional zoning. Liang Sicheng and colleagues held slightly different opinions on population calculation in the suburbs, the size of industrial population and industrial land, and the distances of residential areas from those by Soviet experts. However, the issue of large-scale planning and the preservation or demolition of city walls was not included in the debate. Liang Sicheng's main disagreement with Soviet expert report focused on the planning of the central administrative zone, which constituted the main content and planning ideas of the Liang-Chen Plan.

关 键 词：城市史 城市规划史 首都 北京 中央行政区 

分 类 号：TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]