检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学行政学院
出 处:《中州学刊》2019年第10期77-84,共8页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“中德地方环境治理模式比较研究”(18CZZ010)
摘 要:我国自2000年起开始推行城市生活垃圾分类试点工作。在实践中,为降低政策执行成本,各地结合自身实际,采取行政机制、市场机制和社会机制引导居民参与垃圾分类,相应形成了三种垃圾分类治理模式。从我国目前这三种分类模式的交易成本及内在运作机制的分析可见,尽管政策执行过程体现了追求效率的逻辑,但面对治理机制自身合法性的约束,各种治理模式降低交易成本的效果并不理想,垃圾分类政策执行面临着重重阻力。为改变这一困境,结合当前垃圾分类治理的新形势,应进一步加深对各种治理模式、治理主体的认识,鼓励各方力量参与,整合多元治理机制,实现垃圾分类的协同治理。Since 2000,China has carried out the pilot work of municipal solid waste sorting(MSWS).In practice,in order to reduce the cost of policy implementation,local governments have adopted administrative mechanism,market mechanism and social mechanism to guide residents to participate in waste sorting,thus forming three governance patterns of municipal solid waste sorting.From the analysis of transaction cost and internal operation mechanism of these three sorting modes,it can be seen that although the policy implementation process embodies the logic of pursuing efficiency,in face of the restriction of the legitimacy of the governance mechanism itself,the effect of various governance modes to reduce transaction cost is not ideal,and the implementation of waste sorting policy faces many obstacles.In order to change this dilemma,according to the new situation of governance of waste sorting,it is suggested to further deepen the understanding of each governance pattern and governance subject,encourage all stakeholders to participate,integrate multiple governance mechanisms and realize collaborative governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171