欧盟主导的投资法庭上诉机制及其对中欧投资争端解决机制的借鉴意义  

The EU-led Investment Court Appellate System and Its Referential Value for China-EU Bilateral Investment Dispute Resolution

作　　者：汪梅清 吴岚[2] WANG Meiqing;WU Lan

机构地区：[1]鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学法学院,荷兰鹿特丹3000DR [2]上海对外经贸大学法学院,上海201600

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2019年第6期71-80,共10页International Business Research

摘　　要：投资者—东道国投资争议解决机制长久以来因裁决不一致、忽视东道国主权等问题而遭受质疑。为解决这些问题,欧盟提出对投资者—东道国投资争议解决机制进行司法化改革,建立国际投资法庭体系,该体系包含上诉机制,明确规定东道国的规制权并设立高标准的法官行为准则。通过对欧盟投资法庭机制中的上诉机制进行研究分析,发现其存在上诉范围与发回重审范围界限不清、上诉法庭成员的选拔方式不明、法官薪酬过低、实践经验参差不齐等不足。在中欧双边投资保护协定的谈判过程中,可以部分借鉴欧盟主导的投资法庭机制,建立上诉机制,但应在上诉程序中增加磋商机制;同时坚持保留争议双方在上诉机构成员选择上的自主性,并采用双层酬劳机制以确保高水平法官的选任。Investor-state dispute settlement mechanism has long faced legitimacy questions including inconsistent decisions and ignorance of host country sovereignty.In order to solve these problems,the European Union proposes the judicial reform of the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism and establishes an international investment court system.The system includes an appellate mechanism which clearly stipulates the host country's regulatory powers and sets high standards of judges’code of conduct.This paper studies and analyzes the appeallte mechanism in the EU investment court system and believes that there are deficiencies in unclear boundary between appeallate scope and the scope of remanding for retrial,unclear selection method of appeallate court members,low salary of judeges,and uneven pratical experience.This paper points out that during the negotiation between China-EU on bilateral investment,the EU-led investment court system can be partially used to establish an appellate mechanism which includes the consultation mechanism.At the same time,the autonomy of parties in dispute should be retained in choosing the members of appellate body and a two-tiered compensation mechanism should be used to ensure the introduction of high-level judges.

关 键 词：投资仲裁上诉机制 投资法庭 中欧双边投资协定 

分 类 号：DF964[政治法律—国际法学]