比较视野下后发地区现代化与中国道路  

Modernization of late-developing areas and China Road in a comparative perspective

作　　者：吴海江[1] 徐伟轩 WU Hai-jiang;XU Wei-xuan(Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2019年第6期5-12,共8页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“作为新发展理念的创新发展研究”(项目号:16BKS065)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：自新航路开辟以来,现代化就是分析世界历史演进的理论范式,也是关涉后发地区命运的主旨行动。中、西、马依据条件和立场的差异,提出不同的建构方案。马克思恩格斯根据唯物史观的社会发展规律,逐渐洞察到后发地区发展运动的特殊性,为后发国家的现代转向提供了方法借鉴。当代西方主流现代化理论在“西方中心论”的思维惯性中,模糊了“第一”与“唯一”,“独特”与“普世”的本质差异,不可避免地造成理论整体的失范。相较于拉丁美洲和东亚地区“中心—边缘”依附发展的莫衷一是,置身于民族复兴和人民解放情境的中国道路,以最持久、最深刻、最广泛的历史变革,正在成为人类探索契合国情、符合社情、顺应世情的理想典范。Since the opening of the New Shipping Route, modernization has been not only a theoretical paradigm for analyzing the evolution of world history, but also a main action concerning the fate of the late-developing areas. Chinese scholars, Western scholars and Marxist scholars have put forward different construction schemes based on the different conditions and positions. According to the law of social development of historical materialism, Marx and Engels gradually revealed the particularity of the development trend in the late-developing areas, which provides a method for their modern turn. In the traditional thinking mode of “Western Centralism”, the mainstream modernization theory of the contemporary West blurs the essential differences between “first” and “only”,“unique” and “universal”, which inevitably leads to the ambiguity of the whole theory. Compared with the “center-edge” dependent development in Latin America and East Asia, China Road in the context of national rejuvenation and people s liberation, with the most lasting, profound and extensive historical changes, is becoming an ideal model for human beings to explore conformity to national conditions, social conditions and the world situation.

关 键 词：现代化 后发地区 依附发展 中国道路 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]