检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭爽[1] 崔佳 TAN Shuang;CUI Jia
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学(北京)文法学院
出 处:《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第6期23-32,111,共11页Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“城市垃圾危机视阈下环境治理政社协同的场域、机制与路径研究”(17CGL038)
摘 要:随着我国政府职能转变,政策系统开放性提升,政策子系统参与者的活跃度增加。作为政策子系统参与者的重要组成部分,环境NGO近年来在各类环境议题上持续展开政策倡导,取得了一定成绩,但也存在诸多障碍。基于“倡议联盟框架”,以垃圾议题社会组织LM为对象,剖析其政策倡导实践,发现其在政策倡导实践中存在条件有限、过程艰难、作用有限、效果不佳困境,进而,依据“破解难度—重要程度”两个维度排列出趋同政策信念、盘活倡导资源、拓展政策场地以及自身能力建设的优先顺序并提出详尽的困境破解之道。With the change of China′s government function and the openness of policy system,the participants of policy subsystem are becoming more active.As a major part of this,environmental NGOs in recent years continue to carry out policy advocacyon a variety of environmental issuesand achieved some achievements,with obstacles remained however.Based on the"Initiative Alliance Framework",this paper analyzes its policy advocacy practice and four kinds of advocacy predicament with LM,a social organization of garbage topic,as the subject.It is found that the cracking mode of advocating predicament can be divided according to four kinds of difficulty coefficient,and the logical order of convergent policy belief,activating resource advocacy,expanding policy site and its own capacity building is put forward.Detailed suggestions from the four aspects are proposed as how to solve the above predicament.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.165