两种网球底线击球技术特点及其生物力学特征的比较分析  

Characteristics and comparison two kinds of baseline drives

作　　者：潘晟[1] 张宏成[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学体育学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（自然科学版）》2002年第4期102-105,共4页Journal of Soochow University(Natural Science Edition)

摘　　要：分析两种不同网球底线击球技术的握拍法、步法和引拍挥拍的运动轨迹 ,比较它们的技术特点及其生物力学特征 .认为现代鞭打式击球技术比传统长行程击球技术有明显优势 ,可以击出力量更大 ,速度更快 ,旋转更强 ,极具穿透力的上旋球 ,显著的提高了击球的攻击性和稳定性 。Analyze the racket grasp style, footwork, and the course of lead and brandish of the two baseline drives respectively, and compare the techniques and bio-mechanical characteristics between. The writer believes that modern thrash drive is more advanced as compared to traditional long-course drive. Its topspin volley may enjoy higher speed, stronger power and spin, and more forceful penetrate. Obviously, this kind of drive may increase aggressiveness and stability, and should be of priority in tennis teaching and training.

关 键 词：网球 底线击球技术 生物力学 比较分析 握拍法 步法 

分 类 号：G845[文化科学—体育训练]