检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李梦琳 LI Meng-lin(Law School of China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing,100088)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法学院
出 处:《行政法学研究》2019年第4期123-132,共10页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基 金:中国政法大学2017年博士研究生创新基金项目“行政法视野下的网络直播规制研究”(2017BSCX05)
摘 要:在数字经济技术的推动下,我国网络直播平台发展迅猛。在现有网络平台监管模式下,网络直播平台作为私法主体行使行政法上的监管职责,在被课予第三方义务时没有获得监管权力,在平台运营阶段基于合同获得监管授权,这种混乱的定位和平台以获取流量为盈利的模式造成了网络直播平台监管机制的硬性缺陷。网络直播平台作为新一代看门人具有合同性、技术性、合作性的新特点,在监管过程中应以合同治理为基础,从平台准入、平台运营和后平台三个阶段出发,结合算法规制、人群治理、声誉机制和助推理论等理论来架构科学、合理的网络直播监管机制。Driven by digital economic technology, China's live video streaming platforms have witnessedrapid development. Given the current supervisory model for online platforms, live video streamingplatforms, as the subject of private law, fulfill supervisory responsibilities according to the administrativelaw but they have no supervisory power when being given third-party obligations, and just gain supervisoryauthorization based on contracts at the platform operating stage. Such chaotic orientation and the traffic-oriented model have resulted in substantial flaws in the supervisory mechanism of live video streamingplatforms. Live video streaming platforms, as the new generation of gatekeeper, possess contractual,technical and cooperative characteristics. In the supervisory process, based on contract governance, weshall start with platform access, platform operating and post-platform, and build a scientific and reasonablesupervisory mechanism according to such theories as algorithm regulation, population governance,reputation mechanism and boosting theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40