检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈兵 孟雪晨 张东 储玲[1] 严云志[1] CHEN Bing;MENG Xuechen;ZHANG Dong;CHU Ling;YAN Yunzhi(Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotic Environmental and Ecological Safety,College of Life Sciences,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽师范大学生命科学学院安徽省高校生物环境与生态安全省级重点实验室
出 处:《生态学报》2019年第15期5730-5745,共16页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31500452,31872251)
摘 要:确定鱼类群落的空间格局是保护和管理河流鱼类多样性的基础。尽管河流鱼类分类群(基于物种组成)的纵向梯度格局已得到大量报道,但其功能群(基于功能特征)的空间格局研究较少。以皖南山区新安江为研究流域,沿其“正源?下游”梯度共设置27个调查样点,分别于2017年5月和10月完成2次调查取样,着重研究了鱼类分类群和功能群结构的纵向梯度格局及其形成机制。共采集鱼类44种,可分为5个运动功能群和4个营养功能群,构成14个“营养?运动”复合功能群。双因素交互相似性分析结果显示,鱼类分类群和功能群均随河流级别显著变化,但两者均无显著的季节变化;根据相似性百分比分析,由1级至3级河流,数量优势物种和功能群的空间变化主要呈嵌套格局,而由3级至5级河流其变化主要呈周转格局。方差分解结果显示,局域栖息地、陆地景观和支流空间位置3类解释变量对分类群和功能群空间变化的解释率分别为33.6%和38.5%,其中,分类群受局域栖息地和支流空间位置变量的显著影响,而功能群受局域栖息地和陆地景观变量的显著影响。研究表明,沿着新安江的“上游?下游”纵向梯度,鱼类分类群和功能群的空间格局基本一致,但两者的形成机制不同:分类群的纵向梯度变化受环境过滤和扩散过程的联合影响,而功能群则主要受环境过滤影响。Identifying spatial patterns is important for the conservation and management of fish diversity in streams.The spatial variation along the upstream?downstream gradient in stream fish assemblages has been substantially investigated previously.However,most investigations have focused on the species?composition?based taxonomic organizations but the species?trait?based functional organizations have received less attention.In this study,we sampled fishes from 27 segments along the upstream?downstream gradient of the Xin′an River during May and October 2017.Our aims were to examine the longitudinal variation in taxonomic and functional assemblages of stream fish assemblages,and to determine the relative importance of local habitat,segment spatial position,and landscape condition on fish assemblage composition.According to the feeding habits and locomotion traits of the fishes,the 44 species collected in this study were divided into four feeding groups,five locomotion groups,and 14 combined feeding?locomotion groups.A two?way crossed ANOSIM showed that both taxonomic and functional organizations differed significantly among the 1^st—to 5^th?order streams,but they did not differ significantly between May and October.According to SIMPER,the spatial patterns of abundance?dominant species and functional guilds were similar along the upstream?downstream gradient.From the 1^st—to 3^rd? order streams,the changes in fish assemblages agreed with the patterns of community nestedness,i.e.,small assemblages nested within larger assemblages.However,from the 3^rd—to 5^th?order streams,the changes agreed with patterns of community turnover,i.e.,both species/guild loss and gain occurring from one assemblage to another.Variance partitioning showed that all three types of explanatory variables measured(i.e.,local habitat,landscape condition,and segment spatial position)explained 33.6%of the spatial variation in taxonomic organizations and 38.5%of the functional organizations.In addition,the taxonomic organizations was significant
关 键 词:河流连续统 群落周转与嵌套 环境过滤与扩散限制 分类群和功能群
分 类 号:TP3[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222