专家辅助人之功能实现在涉医诉讼中的障碍及其疏通  

The Functional Obstacles of Medical Expert Assistants in Medical Litigation and Its Solution

作　　者：陶然 邸笛 石悦 Tao Ran;Di Di;Shi Yue

机构地区：[1]大连医科大学人文与社会科学学院 [2]大连市甘井子区司法局

出　　处：《医学与法学》2019年第4期68-71,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项项目“司法鉴定与专家辅助人制度的共存问题研究”(项目编号:YF17-Y18)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：诉讼主体医学知识的缺乏使涉医诉讼在事实认定中面临挑战,解决这些医学专门性问题的鉴定意见亦存在“一证独大”“重复鉴定”“多头鉴定”等诸多问题;将专家辅助人出庭制度写入诉讼法,对于法官公正审判、提高司法鉴定效率、保证诉讼有效进行意义重大,但在涉医诉讼中专家辅助人出庭制度的功能实现却现诸种障碍而难达预期之效。文章就此而从专家辅助人的诉讼地位、中立性设定、权责分担等方面进行分析并作理论设定,以期有益于制度的完善。The lack of medical knowledge of the litigant subject leads to the challenge in the fact ascertainment of medical-related litigation.However,there are many problems in the identification opinions that are used to solve these medical problems,such as"the dominant role of identification opinions","repeated identification",and"multi-pointed identification".It is of great significance to include the system of expert assistants in the procedural law in order to ensure the judge's fair judgement,improve the efficiency of judicial identification and ensure the effective proceeding of litigation.However,there are various obstacles to the realization of the system of expert assisting people to appear in court in medical litigation,and it is difficult to achieve the expected effect.Therefore,this paper analyzes and sets up the theory from the aspects such as the litigation status,the neutral setting and power and responsibility sharing of the expert assistants so as to improve the system.

关 键 词：专家辅助人 涉医诉讼 中立性 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]