检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘卉[1] Liu Hui
机构地区:[1]山西省临汾市人民医院
出 处:《中医临床研究》2019年第19期101-102,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨冰刺激对脑卒中后吞咽障碍的康复疗效。方法:抽取2017年4月-2018年4月我院收治的90例脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者进行随机分组。对照组予以常规吞咽康复训练治疗,观察组则予以常规吞咽康复训练联合冰刺激治疗。比较两组转归率;吞咽障碍消失时间;治疗前后患者吞咽功能评分情况、脑卒中生活质量评分;治疗不良反应。结果:观察组转归率高于对照组,P<0.05;观察组吞咽障碍消失时间优于对照组,P<0.05;治疗前两组吞咽功能评分情况、脑卒中生活质量评分并无明显差异,P>0.05;治疗后观察组吞咽功能评分情况、脑卒中生活质量评分优于对照组,P<0.05。两组均未出现相关不良反应。结论:常规吞咽康复训练联合冰刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的疗效确切,可有效改善吞咽功能和患者的生活质量,无不良反应,值得推广应用。Objective:To investigate the rehabilitation effect of ice stimulation on dysphagia after stroke.Methods:90 patients with dysphagia after stroke were randomly grouped.The control group was treated by routine swallowing rehabilitation training.The observation group was treated by ice stimulation more.Results:The outcome rate in the observation group was higher than the control group,P<0.05.The disappearance time of dysphagia in observation group was better than the control group,P<0.05.The score of swallowing function and quality of life score of stroke in the observation group was better than the control group after treatment,P<0.05.There were no related adverse reactions in two groups.Conclusion:Routine swallowing rehabilitation training and ice stimulation were effective,can effectively improve the swallowing function and the quality of life,without adverse effects,and is worthy of popularization and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.179.147