生态修复的法律界定及目标  

Definition and Goal of Ecological Rehabilitation from the Perspective of Law

作　　者：陈红梅[1] CHEN Hongmei

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学法学院

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第8期55-65,共11页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“农业现代化建设的制度引领和保障研究”(批准号:15AZD009);江苏省社会科学基金项目“相邻环境权益的私法保护研究”(批准号:14FXD008)

摘　　要：在环境科学领域,生态修复与环境修复、生态恢复、生态重建等概念并不能等同。由于未对环境科学领域有关概念加以辨别,我国立法中有关“生态修复”名称非常的不统一,呈现出较为混乱的局面,同时也导致了司法实践中生态修复目标设定的困境。法律视野下生态修复的对象及范围要比环境科学中生态修复的对象和范围小。它不包括因自然原因造成的退化生态系统的修复,主要是指通过人力作用的生态修复。生态损害必须具有可修复性,且表现为一种不利益的状态。生态修复的法律目标设定应当具有整体性和全局性。在生态修复方案的选择与确定上应当具有妥当性、可行性及合法性。生态修复目标的落实需要司法机关与行政机关的配合与协调。In the field of environmental science,ecological rehabilitation is a concept differing from environmental restoration, ecological restoration, and ecological reconstruction. Since there is no distinction between relevant concepts in the field of environmental science,the name of "ecological rehabilitation"in China’s legislation is very inconsistent and chaotic. At the same time,it also results in a dilemma of setting ecological restoration goals in judicial practice. The legal object and scope of ecological rehabilitation is smaller than the ecological rehabilitation in environmental science. It does not include the ecological rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems caused by nature,but mainly refers to the ecological rehabilitation through human actions. Ecological damage must be repairable and it is a difference of interest. The establishment of the legal goal of ecological rehabilitation should be holistic and comprehensive. There should be appropriateness, feasibility, and legitimacy in the selection and determination of ecological rehabilitation programs. The implementation of ecological rehabilitation goals requires coordination between the judiciary and administrative organ.

关 键 词：生态修复 生态损害 恢复原状 定义与目标 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]