检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨龙 谢昌凡 赵阳 YANG Long;XIE Chang-fan;ZHAO Yang(School of Public Administration,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China)
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学公共管理学院,福建 福州 350002
出 处:《农林经济管理学报》2019年第4期539-547,共9页Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CGL035)
摘 要:基于湖南、湖北、重庆和贵州4省(市)贫困地区的农户调研数据,使用内生转换回归模型(ESR)从土地产值、作物种植结构和土地细碎化程度3个方面分析农户参与农业产业扶贫对家庭土地利用的影响,并采用偏差矫正匹配估计量方法检验结果的稳健性。研究发现:户主健康状况、家庭耕种土地面积、家中病人数量、参加合作经济组织、村庄组织外出务工、村庄组织过技术培训以及村庄基础设施投资等因素对农户选择参与农业产业扶贫有显著影响;农户参与农业产业扶贫会显著提高家庭种植结构的经济作物化程度和土地细碎化程度,但对不同群体的影响存在差异,参与农业产业扶贫会显著增加贫困户土地产值,而对非贫困户土地产值的增加没有显著影响。Based on the data of households in Hu’nan,Hubei,Chongqing and Guizhou,this paper evalu?ated the impact of agriculture industrialization poverty alleviation(AIPA)projects on household land utiliza?tion in the aspects of land output,planting structure and land fragmentation with the help of the endogenous switching regression model(ESR).Bias-corrected matching method is used to testify the robustness of the find?ings.The results show that the householder’s health condition,land area,number of patients,participation in the economic cooperative organizations,migrant working organized by village,technical training and the infra?structure investment in village have a significant impact on the choice of households participating in the AIPA projects.Participation will significantly make a household’s planting structure more commercial and the land more fragmented.However,participation in the AIPA has different impacts on different groups.It can signifi?cantly increase the land output of poor households while having no significant effect on non-poor households.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222