故意中意义认知和违法性认识的关系研究  

The Relationship between Criminal Intention and Illegal consciousness

作　　者：于润芝 Yu Run-zhi

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2019年第3期94-107,共14页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“法定犯时代下空白规范的刑法认知问题研究”(项目编号:18YJC820063);江苏省社会科学基金项目“行政犯的违法性认识问题研究”(项目编号:18FXC006)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：违法性认识相关争论能够还原为如何界定故意内容、理解责任根据等问题。故意中意义认知与违法性认识关系的确立,可以揭示违法性认识命题下故意说和责任说的根本分歧,也可以作为区分事实错误和法律错误的实质标准。以我国刑法第14条为依据,意义认知是行为人在社会意义上对犯罪事实有害性的认识,该认识须达到能够被裁判者评价为社会危害性的程度;违法性认识是对表征社会危害性程度的形式意义上违反刑法的认识,具备认识可能性即可。前置性行政法规错误应区分处理:若行为人不通过行政法规也能认识到作为禁止实体的有害性,属于法律错误;若难以通过对社会一般价值观念的了解而认识行为有害性,属于事实错误。The discussion of illegal consciousness is related to issues such as deliberate definition and understanding of responsibility.Establishing the relationship between cognition of significance and Illegal consciousness can reveal the fundamental difference between intentional theory and responsibility theory.According to Article 14 in the Criminal Law of People’s Republic of China,cognition of significance means the understanding of the perpetrator’s harmfulness to criminal facts in the social significance,and need to be judged by the referee as the social harm;Illegal consciousness is an understanding of the formal violation of criminal law,and it requires the possibility of understanding.The mistakes of administrative regulations should be treated as follows:If the perpetrator does not need to recognize the administrative regulations and can recognize the object of the prohibition,it is a mistake of law.If without knowing the values of society,we cannot recognize the object of prohibition,instead,it shall be seen as mistake of fact.

关 键 词：意义认知 违法性认识 法律错误 事实错误 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]