检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张政 ZHANG Zheng(School of History and Tourist Culture,Shanxi Normal University,Linfen,Shanxi,041000,China)
机构地区:[1]山西师范大学历史与旅游文化学院
出 处:《内江师范学院学报》2019年第9期83-87,共5页Journal of Neijiang Normal University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“中国近代科学文化共同体研究”(16BZX029)
摘 要:1922年北洋政府颁布《管理医士规则》,力图将中医行业纳入卫生行政法制轨道之中。然而,由于这一规定简单地复制了以西方医学为背景的西方卫生行政法制,而没有顾及到国内中医界各方面的实际状况,使得这一法规在政策导向和具体规则的制定上都不符合中医的实际情况,反而加剧了中医群体与国家行政力量之间的矛盾,引起了国内中医界的强烈抗议,在具体执行过程中这一规定也由于缺乏可操作性而举步维艰,最终导致《管理医士规则》被迫缓行。In 1922,Beiyang Government issued Doctor Management Rules in an attempt to bring the traditional Chinese medicine into the sanitary administrative legal system.However,due to the simple copy of the Western counterpart with the Western medicine background and failure to take into consideration the reality of the traditional Chinese medicine,the orientation of the rules and the making of the specific rules were not in accordance with the Chinese medicine.This intensified the contradiction between groups of the traditional Chinese medicine and the national administration and aroused the strong protest.Therefore,the rules were in predicament and had to be suspended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.186.66