检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王慧敏 沈煜恺[2] Wang Huimin;Shen Yukai(Nanshan Health Supervision Institute,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518055;Futian Branch of Shenzhen Public Security Bureau,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518017)
机构地区:[1]深圳市南山区卫生监督所,广东深圳518055 [2]深圳市公安局福田分局,广东深圳518017
出 处:《中国卫生监督杂志》2019年第4期328-331,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Inspection
摘 要:现阶段,在卫生监督工作中运用到医疗损害司法鉴定意见的医疗损害纠纷案件逐渐增多。在医疗损害司法鉴定管理制度尚未完善的现实情况下,作者通过客观审查质证医疗损害司法鉴定意见书的证明力有无及大小,对提高医疗纠纷案件办结效率,厘清医疗机构和相关卫生技术人员在医疗损害事件中的过错和责任,保障患者医疗安全的合法权益有积极意义。Medical damages judicial authentication opinions of medical injury disputes applied to the health supervision work increase gradually.In the current situation that the medical damage judicial authentication management system is not yet perfect,objective review and cross-examination are essential part for the probative force of medical damage judicial authentication opinions,in order to improve the efficiency of medical dispute cases-handling,clarify the fault and responsibility of the medical institutions and related health technicians in the medical damage events and protect the patients’legitimate interests in medical security.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28