两种方法摘出眼内磁性异物的效果比较  

Comparison of the efficacy of two methods to extract intraocular magnetic foreign bodies

作　　者：高燕 原莉莉[1] 张东昌[1] 李冬平[1] Gao Yan;Yuan Lili;Zhang Dongchang;Li Dongping(Department of Vitreoretinology,Shanxi Eye Hospital,Taiyuan 030001,China)

机构地区：[1]山西省眼科医院玻璃体视网膜科,太原030001

出　　处：《中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志》2019年第8期576-579,共4页Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease

摘　　要：目的比较眼内磁性异物摘出的两种不同方法的效果。方法回顾性分析本院2016年1月至2017年12月165例眼内磁性异物摘出手术的资料。患者随机分为两组:A组89例由原伤口以磁铁吸引摘出,B组76例经玻璃体摘出。术后随访12~15个月进行分析。结果术后A组视力提高64眼(71.91%),视力不变6眼(6.74%),B组视力提高66眼(86.89%),视力不变7眼(9.21%),两组视力提高率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.055,P=0.801)。结论两种摘出方法效果相似。Objective To compare the efficacy of two different methods of intraocular magnetic foreign body extraction.Methods From Jan.2016 to Dec.2017,the data of 165 cases who received intraocular magnetic foreign bodies extraction in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively.All cases were randomly divided into two groups.Group A,89 cases,received extraction of magnetic foreign bodies through the original wound,and group B,76 cases,received extraction of intraocular magnetic foreign bodies through the vitreous.Postoperative the follow-up time was 12-15 months.Results The visual acuity of group A improved in 64 eyes(71.91%),remained unchanged in 6 eyes(6.74%).Visual acuity was improved in 66 eyes(86.89%)of group B,unchanged in 7 eyes(9.21%).The difference in visual acuity improvement rate was not statistically significant between the two groups(χ2=0.055,P=0.801).The rates of complication of the two groups were similar.Conclusion The efficacies of two methods of extraction of intraocular magnetic foreign bodies are similar.

关 键 词：异物 眼内 磁性 摘出术 磁吸 原伤口 摘出术 经玻璃体 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]