检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭兴华[1] PENG Xing-hua(Center for Judge Training,Higher People's Court of Hunan Province,Changsha,Hunan 410001,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南省高级人民法院法官培训中心
出 处:《石家庄学院学报》2019年第5期40-48,共9页Journal of Shijiazhuang University
摘 要:关键设施理论是美国反垄断法中的一个重要理论,其具有合理的经济学依据。美国关于United States v.Terminal Railway Ass’n案、United States v.Associated Press案和Otter Tail Power v.United States案的判决奠定了美国关键设施理论的基础。尽管传统上美国法院一般将关键设施理论适用于基础设施领域,但现在其也越来越多地将该理论适用于知识产权领域以消除知识产权人滥用知识产权的行为,并维护市场的公平竞争,这无疑对完善我国的《反垄断法》有重大的借鉴意义。The essential facilities doctrine is an important theory in the anti-trust law of the United States,which has reasonable economic rationales.The sentence of the United States v.Terminal Railway Ass'n,United States v.Associated Press and Otter Tail Power v.United States lay the foundations of essential facilities doctrine of the United States.Though the American courts traditionally apply the doctrine to the cases involving fundamental facilities,they have began to apply the doctrine to the intellectual property cases more and more so as to diminish the abuse practices of intellectual properties and maintain the fair competition of the market,which undoubtedly has the significant reference to the consummation of Chinese“Anti-monopoly Law”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7