检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范良聪[1] Fan Liangcong
机构地区:[1]浙江大学光华法学院
出 处:《法治现代化研究》2019年第4期158-171,共14页Law and Modernization
摘 要:基于市场、政府双失灵这一逻辑基础和理论前提构建的经济法范式框架基础十分薄弱,存在明显缺陷。本文旨在从法律规制常常失灵这一现象入手,剖析法律规制失灵的原因,探讨新时期经济法功能定位转变的可能进路。法律规制失灵不可避免,因为法律规制无法改变市场运行尤其是市场主体竞争稀缺资源的本质,而只会改变竞争的准则和稀缺资源配置的方式;同时,法律规制的成功要求规制者、被规制者以及规制的保护对象三类市场主体合理行动,而这很难实现。最后,法律规制还可能带来一系列潜在的成本,使其难以满足比例原则的要求。未来应当基于治理理论重新审视政府与市场之间的复杂关系,寻找经济法的理论基础和功能定位。The framework of the economic law is weak in its foundation constituted by the logic and theoretical premise that the government and the market can both fail to play their functions.This is an obvious defect.In this paper,we try to analyze the causes for economic law’s failure in playing its regulatory function and explore a possible approach to transforming the function of economic law in the new era.The failure of legal regulation and restriction is unavoidable to some extent,because it cannot change the essence of the market operation where the market players compete for the limited resources.What can be changed is the code governing the competition and the manner of resource allocation.At the same time,the success in legal regulation and restriction lies in the fact that the actions taken by the three major players(i.e.the regulators,the regulatees,and those who are protected)are rational.But this aim is difficult to achieve.Finally,the legal regulation and restriction will bring about a series of potential costs,which makes it difficult to meet the requirement imposed by the principle of proportion.In the future,the complex relationship between the government and the market should be reconsidered from the perspective of governance theory,seeking a better theoretical foundation and functional position for economic law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28