检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胥美美[1] 钟华[1] 李宜霏 单连慧[1] 安新颖[1] XU Meimei;ZHONG Hua;LI Yi-fei(Institute of Medical Information,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing,100020,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院医学信息研究所
出 处:《中国医院管理》2019年第9期55-58,共4页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:中国医学科学院中央级科研院所基本科研业务具专项(2016RC330003,2017PT63004);中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新项目(2016-12m-3-018)
摘 要:目的对我国三级医院科研效率进行分析,为相关科研管理部门制定决策提供参考。方法收集全国100家三级医院科研效率评价指标数据,采用主客观方法相结合确定评价指标体系,构建DEA模型,对医院科研效率水平进行分析评价。结果2015年全国100家三级医院科研综合效率平均水平为0.5875,规模效率平均水平为0.8664,纯技术效率的平均水平为0.6832。6.0%的医院达到DEA相对有效,6.0%的医院规模收益不变。结论我国三级医院科研效率水平较低,有待提高。建议从国家、地方、医院三个层面调整或制定相关政策以提升我国三级医院科研效率。Objective To evaluate the scientific research efficiency of tertiary hospitals in China,to provide reference for the decision-making of scientific research departments in China.Methods The evaluation indicator data of 100 tertiary hos?pitals were collected.The evaluation indicators were defined based on the subjective and objective methods.The scientific research efficiency was evaluated through using DEA method.Results The average comprehensive technical efficiency,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of 100 tertiary hospitals were 0.587 5,0.683 2 and 0.866 4.Only 6.0%hospi?tals were identified as technically efficient,while 6.0%were in the status of fixed to scale.Conclusion The level of scientif?ic research efficiency of tertiary hospitals in China is low.Policies should be adjusted or made from the state,local and hospital levels to improve the efficiency of scientific research in tertiary hospitals in China.
分 类 号:R197.323.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117