轮奸认定中的三个误区  

Three Misunderstandings in the Identification of Gang Rape

作　　者：刘国平 Liu Guoping(Department of Law and Politics,Nankai University Binhai College,Tianjin 300270)

机构地区：[1]南开大学滨海学院法政学系

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2019年第5期159-166,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“留守儿童性被害法律问题研究”的阶段性成果(项目编号:16SFB5018)

摘　　要：作为强奸罪的加重处罚情节,轮奸能否得到正确认定不但关系到犯罪的准确打击,也关系到人权的基本保障。轮奸并非强奸罪的共同正犯类型,不但共犯行为可以成立轮奸,也存在客观上无共同奸淫行为的轮奸类型;引入亲手犯理论来解释轮奸认定问题并不合适,对轮奸认定疑难问题的解决应回归到对轮奸基本概念的把握和刑法基础理论的运用;不能一律否定轮奸犯罪中存在未完成形态,承认轮奸存在未完成形态不但符合刑事法理,也更有利于实现罪刑均衡。As an aggravating circumstance of rape,whether gang rape can be correctly identified is not only related to the accurate attack of crime,but also related to the basic protection of human rights.Gang rape is not the type of joint principal offender for rape.The accomplice behavior can establish a gang rape,but there is the type of rape which objectively has no cooperative rape behaviors.It is not appropriate to introduce the theory of personally committing crime to explain the problem of gang rape identification.The solution to the problem of gang rape identification should return to the grasp of the basic concept of gang rape and the application of the basic theory of criminal law;It cannot be denied that there is an unfinished form in the crime of gang rape.Recognizing the unfinished form of gang rape is not only in line with criminal law,but also conducive to the realization of the balance between crime and punishment.

关 键 词：轮奸 共同正犯 亲手犯 轮奸未遂 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]