检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:褚清清[1] Chu Qingqing(Mudanjiang Normal College,Mudanjiang Heilongjiang 157011,China)
机构地区:[1]牡丹江师范学院
出 处:《未来与发展》2019年第9期15-18,共4页Future and Development
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅备案项目“权利与权力关系视阈下的协商民主制度研究”(1351MSYYB022)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:人工智能的迅猛发展导致新型社会关系的迸发,这引发了人们巨大的法律焦虑,对于人工智能法律主体地位的追问成为了法学界关注的焦点。弱人工智能(TOP-DOWN AI)向强人工智能(BOTTOM-UP AI)的发展使得传统法律主体地位的相关理论无法对人工智能适用,人工智能在现实中应用的蓬勃与法律发展在这一领域的空白形成了巨大的反差。本文力图回归到权利与权力本质内涵角度对人工智能法律主体地位进行解析,寻找到矛盾的关键问题所在,并对未来的法律建构提出一些思考。The rapid development of artificial intelligence has led to the emergence of new social relations,which has triggered tremendous legal anxiety,and the questioning of the legal subject status of artificial intelligence has become the focus of attention in the legal field.With the development of TOP-DOWN AI to BOTTOM-UP AI,the traditional theory of legal subject status can not be applied to AI.The vigorous application of AI in reality has formed a huge contrast with the blank development of law in this field.This paper tries to return to the perspective of the essence of rights and powers to analyze the status of AI legal subject,find out the key problems of contradictions,and put forward some thoughts on the future legal construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15