检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董玉庭[1] DONG Yu-ting(Law School,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学法学院
出 处:《现代法学》2019年第5期120-134,共15页Modern Law Science
摘 要:人工智能被赋予公民身份这一事件对刑法提出了挑战,人工智能能否成为刑事责任主体变成了一个值得讨论的话题。从刑法成长规律看,刑法的成长可分为量变型、质变型和突变型三种类型。在想象中的奇点到来之前,人工智能带给当下刑法的只能是量变型或质变型成长,只有假想的超级人工智能才可能导致刑法发生突变,但突变后的刑法已不再是当下刑法了。真正对当下刑法提出挑战的是人工智能与生物工程结合后改造人类自身。Granting artificial intelligence(AI)with citizenship will challenge the criminal law as whether AI can be the subject of criminal liability is a topic that needs to be discussed further.Based on the developing rule,the criminal law will be developed in quantity,quality or mutation.Before the coming of the imaginary singularity,AI would only bring quantitative or qualitative growth to the criminal law,while mutation may only occur for fictitious super AI and no longer be the current criminal law after mutation.What really challenges the current criminal law is the transformation of human beings with the combination of AI and bioengineering.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249