国际针刺效力研究的分析现状  

Analysis of current situation of international acupuncture efficacy research

作　　者：项燕 胡柳 何锦园[3] XIANG Yan;HU Liu;HE Jin-yuan(Sanya Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Sanya 572000,China;The Seventh Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Shenzhen 518107,China;The Third Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510630,China)

机构地区：[1]三亚市妇幼保健院,三亚572000 [2]中山大学附属第七医院,深圳518107 [3]中山大学附属第三医院,广州510630

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2019年第9期4223-4226,共4页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：在医疗决策需要科学证据的时代背景下,当针刺疗法进入世界医学领域,固然也要接受提供临床证据之挑战。2016年,英美两国重要机构和杂志先后认为"没有足够证据证明针刺优于假针",进而否认针刺效力。于是国内展开多方面的研究以探究竟。文章即针对诸多国内分析现状进行综述,并提出不足之处,试图找出国外针刺效力低下的关键所在。In the era of medical decision-making that requires scientific evidence, when acupuncture therapy enters the world medical field, it is also necessary to accept the challenge of providing clinical evidence. In 2016, important organizations and magazines in Britain and America thought that ‘there is not enough evidence to prove that acupuncture is superior than fake needles’ and denied the effect of acupuncture. Therefore, domestic research has been carried out in many ways to explore the problem. This article reviewed the current situations of many domestic analysis, and put forward the shortcomings, trying to find out the key to the low effectiveness of foreign acupuncture.

关 键 词：安慰剂 分析 效力 针刺 

分 类 号：R24[医药卫生—中医临床基础]