检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹琰 刘龙 王禹 王清贤 CAO Yan;LIU Long;WANG Yu;WANG Qingxian(State Key Laboratory of Mathematical Engineering&Advanced Computing,Zhengzhou 450000,China;Henan University of Engineering,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
机构地区:[1]数学工程与先进计算国家重点实验室,河南郑州450000 [2]河南工程学院,河南郑州450000
出 处:《网络与信息安全学报》2019年第5期56-63,共8页Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security
基 金:国家重点研发计划基金资助项目(No.2017YFB0803202,No.2016QY07X1404)~~
摘 要:基于结构化的补丁比对是软件漏洞辅助分析的重要方法。在分析总结已有补丁比对技术及反补丁比对技术的基础上,针对结构化比对存在无法进行语义分析而导致误报的问题,提出了基于函数语义分析的软件补丁比对方法。利用传统的结构化比对方法,在函数级进行语法差异比较得到最大同构子图;通过程序依赖分析,构建函数输入输出之间的路径包络,基于符号执行以包络为对象计算函数输出特征;通过函数摘要进行语义级比对,结合最大同构子图的匹配函数结果,进一步分析得出发生语义变化的函数。最终,通过实验比对测试,验证了所提方法的可行性和优势。Patch comparison provides support for software vulnerability,and structural comparison has been developed.Based on summarizing binary files comparison and anti-comparison methods,comparison technology was proposed by semantic analysis on function to address the issue that structural comparison cannot carry on semantic analysis.Through traditional structural comparison,syntax differences in function-level were analyzed to find the maximum common subgraph.Then,the path cluster was built between the input and output of the function depend on program dependency analysis.Function output characteristics was established based on symbolic execution.Semantic differences of functions were compared by functional summaries.Based on the maximum isomorphic subgraph,the matched functions which there are possible semantic changes between was further analyzed.Ultimately,the experimental results showed the feasibility and advantages of the proposed method.
分 类 号:TP393[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43