检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院
出 处:《华中建筑》2019年第10期126-129,共4页Huazhong Architecture
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目“中小城市高铁新城地域空间效应与机制研究——以京沪高铁为例”(编号:51878330);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(编号:090214380024);南京大学千层次优质课程建设经费资助(编号:0902145021)
摘 要:乡村振兴战略的背景下,乡村古建的保护与利用显得更为棘手与紧迫。产权私有化具有高效的资源配置作用,但乡村私有古建恰恰出现无人问津的现象,导致私有古建筑面临物质性损坏、功能性腐朽等困境。该文以南京市江宁佘村的潘氏宗祠与潘氏住宅的保护为实证分析,通过深入访谈,发现私有产权下产权人不作为、古建保护主体缺失以及多方博弈是乡村私有古建保护困境的诱因。最后,基于以上原因分析,提出未来优化乡村私有古建保护的建议,包括明确产权内涵、灵活配置产权以及完善相应的制度设计。Under the background of rural revitalization strategy, the protection and utilization of rural ancient buildings is more difficult and urgent. The privatization of property rights has the effect of efficient resource allocation, but the private ancient construction in rural areas has appeared uninhabited, which leads to the dilemma of material damage and functional decay of private ancient buildings. Taking the protection of Panshi ancestral temple and Panshi residence in Jiangning, Nanjing as an empirical analysis, through in-depth interviews, we find that private property rights holders’ inaction, the lack of protection of ancient construction and multi game are the reasons for the protection of private ancient construction in rural areas. Finally, based on the analysis of the above reasons, we put forward some suggestions to optimize the protection of rural private ancient buildings in the future, including the definition of property rights, the flexible allocation of property rights and the improvement of the corresponding system design.
分 类 号:TU984.12[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117