检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王辉 宋亚丽 刘乐 高玉杰 曹江涛 刘娜娜 WANG Hui;SONG Yali;LIU Le;GAO Yujie;CAO Jiangtao;LIU Nana(College of Papermaking Science and Technology,Tianjin University of Science&Technology,Tianjin 300457,China;Qingdao Yuncheng Plate-making Co.,Ltd.,Qingdao 266100,China)
机构地区:[1]天津科技大学造纸学院,天津300457 [2]青岛运城制版有限公司,青岛266100
出 处:《天津科技大学学报》2019年第5期74-80,共7页Journal of Tianjin University of Science & Technology
摘 要:基于GMG和CGS色彩管理软件对数码打样质量的影响进行研究,比较打样纸张未经过色彩管理和分别经过GMG、CGS色彩管理的质量差别,同时比较两款软件打样性能的优异性.结果表明:经过GMG和CGS色彩管理之后,数码打样纸的色域扩大,色彩再现和阶调复制能力显著提高,印刷相对反差值增大,网点扩大减小,整体打样质量较好;就两款软件的比较而言,CGS比GMG色彩校正过程更简捷和准确,在色彩再现、阶调复制、减少网点扩大方面表现更突出,打样质量更高.The impact of GMG and CGS color management software on the quality of digital proofing was studied and compared.The performance of proofed paper was also compared that without color management.The results indicated that the gamut of digitally proofed paper was expanded,the color reproduction and tone reproduction both significantly improved,the relative contrast value was increased,the dot gain was reduced and the overall proofing quality was better than without GMG and CGS color management.The comparison between the two software shows that CGS is simpler and more accurate than GMG during color correcting process and performs better in color reproduction,tone reproduction and dot gain reduction,and thus can provide better proofing quality for digital proofing.
分 类 号:TP391.41[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术] TS805.4[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.201