检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张毅茜 冯晓明[2] 王晓峰[1] 傅伯杰[2,3] 周潮伟 ZHANG Yiqian;FENG Xiaoming;WANG Xiaofeng;FU Bojie;ZHOU Chaowei(School of Earth Science and Resources,Chang′an University,Xi′an 710054,China;State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology,Research Center for Eco Environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100085,China;Institution of Terrestrial Surface System Science and Sustainable Development,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区:[1]长安大学地球科学与资源学院,西安710054 [2]中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京100085 [3]北京师范大学陆地表层系统科学与可持续发展研究院,北京100875
出 处:《生态学报》2019年第20期7367-7381,共15页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:中国科学院科技服务网络计划(KFJ-STS-ZDTP-036);国家重点研发计划(2018YFC0507300);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2018JM4016);陕西省土地整治重点实验室开放基金资助(2018-ZD01)
摘 要:全球变化和人类活动的剧烈影响导致对人类福祉至关重要的生态系统功能和服务的改变,生态系统退化已成为全球面临的严重问题之一。综合评价生态恢复效益是目前衡量恢复工程实施效果的重要途径。以中国重点脆弱生态区为研究对象,选取产水、土壤保持、食物供给、固碳4项服务,构建研究区生态恢复综合效益评估指标体系,并通过Welch T方法检验恢复显著和不显著区生态系统服务指标,对比分析研究区生态恢复综合效益的变化情况。结果表明:2000年到2015年,生态恢复工程的实施使脆弱区生态系统服务整体增长20.86%;综合效益由波动变化转为稳定,并稳定在其均值0.55附近,其中喀斯特区综合效益最高,达0.75以上;生态系统类型变化主要是农田、森林、草地和聚落生态系统之间的转移,森林和草地生态系统的增加使得生态系统服务水平升高;T检验的结果表明生态恢复带来综合效益的改善和生态系统服务能力的提高。The dramatic impact of global change and human activity has led to changes in ecosystem functions and services that are vital to human well beings.Consequently,ecosystem degradation has become a serious problem globally.Comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of ecological restoration is an important way to measure the effects of implementation of restoration projects.In this study,China′s key fragile ecological regions were selected as research objects.Four typical services were selected,including water production,soil conservation,food supply,and carbon sequestration,to construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for ecological restoration in the research area.Welch′s t test was used to test restoration of ecosystem services in significant and insignificant regions and to comparatively analyze changes in the ecological restoration benefits in the study area.The results showed that from 2000 to 2015,the implementation of ecological restoration projects increased the overall ecosystem services of the fragile area by 20.86%.The comprehensive benefit changed from volatility to stability and stabilized around the mean value 0.55.The comprehensive benefit values of the karst area were the highest,reaching greater than or equal to 0.75.The changes in ecological system types were mainly the transformation between farmland,forest,grassland,and settlement ecosystems.The increase in forest and grassland ecosystems promoted the level of ecosystem service.The results of the t test indicated that ecological restoration led to an increase in comprehensive benefits and ecosystem services.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15