检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马德云[1] 张卫民[1] 应锦华 王晓平[1] Ma Deyun;Zhang Weimin;Ying Jinhua;Wang Xiaoping(Dongguan Huangjiang Hospital,Guangdong Province,Dongguan 523750)
机构地区:[1]广东省东莞市黄江医院
出 处:《数理医药学杂志》2019年第11期1614-1615,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨MRI联合阴道超声对剖宫术后瘢痕妊娠的临床应用和诊断价值。方法:选取某院2016年10月~2018年8月妇产科收治的30例患有剖宫术后瘢痕妊娠的患者,按照随机的原则分成两组,观察组(n=15)施行MRI联合阴道超声诊断方法,对照组(n=15)仅实施MRI或者阴道超声其中一种,比较两组的准确率。结果:观察组的诊断准确率为92.31%,显著高于对照组的71.43%,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MRI联合阴道超声对剖宫术后瘢痕妊娠有较好的诊断价值,值得在临床上推广。Objective:To study the clinical application and diagnostic value of MRI combined with vaginal ultrasonography in scar pregnancy after caesarean section. Methods: 30 patients with scar pregnancy after cesarean section admitted to the department of obstetrics and gynecology of a certain hospital from October 2016 to August 2018 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random principle. In the observation group(n=15), MRI combined with vaginal ultrasound was used for diagnosis, while in the control group(n=15), only one of MRI or vaginal ultrasound was used. Compared the accuracy of the two groups. Results: The diagnostic accuracy rate of observation group was 92.31%, significantly higher than that of control group with 71.43%, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: MRI combined vaginal ultrasonography in scar pregnancy after caesarean section has good diagnostic value, which is worth popularizing in clinic.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145