检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐波 陈智 孙怡鋆 金卓 TANG Bo;CHEN Zhi;SUN Yijun;JIN Zhuo(Jiangyin Tianjiang Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.,Jiangyin 214400,China;Jiangsu Province Wuxi Institute for Drug Control,Wuxi 214028,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省江阴市天江药业有限公司,江苏江阴214400 [2]无锡市药品安全检验检测中心,江苏无锡214028
出 处:《山东中医药大学学报》2019年第5期519-522,共4页Journal of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:建立鹿衔草及其伪品红花鹿蹄草的鉴别方法。方法:分别对鹿蹄草、普通鹿蹄草、红花鹿蹄草从原植物形态、药材性状、叶横切面的显微特征、薄层鉴别方面进行比较。结果:鹿蹄草和普通鹿蹄草与红花鹿蹄草原植物在叶形、叶面特征、花色、花萼形状等方面有显著区别;药材在叶形、花萼形状方面也有显著区别;在叶的横切面和薄层鉴别方面,鹿衔草及其伪品红花鹿蹄草亦有差异。结论:鹿衔草药材及其伪品红花鹿蹄草可通过原植物形态、性状、显微特征及薄层色谱进行鉴别。Objective:To identify Luxiancao(Pyrolae Herba) and its pseudo species Pyrola incamata Fisch.ex DC.. Methods:The botanical morphology,medicinal material characters and TLC identification,as well as microscopic characteristics of leaf transverse section were compared between Pyrola calliantha H. Andres and Pyrola decorata H. Andres and Pyrola incamata Fisch. ex DC.. Results:The differences between the three plants were obvious in the shape and facial characteristics of leaf and flower color and calyx shape of the original plant. There were also differences in phylliform and calyx shape of the medicinal parts,as well as leaf transverse section and TLC identification. Conclusion :Luxiancao(Pyrolae Herba) and its pseudo species Pyrola incamata Fisch. ex DC. could be identified by botanical morphology,characters and microscopic characteristics and TLC identification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33