检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季善豪 JI Shanhao(School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200333,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院
出 处:《湖南工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2019年第4期84-87,93,共5页Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:我国主要由特殊与一般法对职务发明及其专利进行规制,此二者的调整对象与适用阶段不同。职务发明人获酬权系知识产权与债权的复合型权利,且不属于职务发明专利权的“从权利”,因此单位主动放弃职务发明专利权但继续利用该技术方案进行营利的,不得拒绝向职务发明人支付报酬。《职务发明条例草案》第十五条在一定程度上解决了专利权自然终止时对职务发明人保护的缺失问题,但仍需对单位支付报酬义务规则以及通知答复制度进行完善。Chinese employee invention and patent are regulated by special law and general law which differ in adjustment object and application stage.The remuneration right of employee-inventor is a compound right composed of intellectual property and right of claims and not a secondary right of employee-invention patent,as a result of which employers should not refuse to pay the employees if they abandon the employee-invention patent but keep seeking profit by exploiting that technology.To some extent,article 15 in Draft Regulations of Employee Invention can cope with the problem of lacking protection for employee-inventors when the employee-invention fails before the expiration of its duration,but there is still something to do to complete the rule of remuneration payment and to make a definite time limit for notification and response.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38