从实义动词到零形语素：“连”省略的制约、效果与动因  

From Notional verbs to Zero-forms: the Restriction, Effect and Motivations of the Omission of "lian"(连)

作　　者：段继绪 DUAN Ji-xu(International College of Chinese Studies,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai,200234;School of Foreign Studies,Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo,Henan,454003)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学对外汉语学院 [2]河南理工大学外国语学院

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第6期132-139,共8页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：河南省教育厅人文社科项目“功能主义视阈下的句式多维度研究”（2019-ZZJH-629）;河南理工大学年度规划项目“强调范畴句法手段汉日对比研究”（SKND2019-05）

摘　　要：依据句法-语义制约关系,将"连……都/也……"格式中"连"的省略分为三类:必须出现;可有可无;自由省略。"连"的省略对语用表达功能差异造成影响,主要体现在语义显豁性、强调强弱性、语体倾向性和语言简洁性等四个方面。"连……都/也……"格式的定型与语义的凝固、"连"语义虚化与句法羡余、高频使用与语言经济性等因素是造成"连"省略的关键动因。从语法化序列看,由于汉语没有屈折形态变化,"连"不可能成为形态成分。如果也不能成为构词成分",连"只能走上零形化道路。Based on syntactic and semantic constraint relations, the omission of "lian" in "lian…dou/ye…" construction could be divided into three categories: never omitted in some sentences;not indispensable but with different meanings;and omitted freely with the meaning unchanged. The omission on the differences of expressions consists of four aspects, explicitness of semantic expression, strength of emphasis, choice of style and simplicity of speech.The main reasons for "lian" omission are in three aspects: syntactic stereotyping and semantic solidification of the "dou/ye" construction, semantic bleaching and syntactic redundancy, high-frequency use and economical principle of language. From the perspective of grammaticalization sequence, with no inflection in Chinese, "lian" could not be a morphological component, and moves only to be a zero-form if it could not be a bound morpheme.

关 键 词：“连”的省略 句法制约 表达差异 动因 

分 类 号：H0.05[语言文字—语言学]