当代中国法治共识的形成及法治再启蒙  

The Formation of a Consensus and Re-enlightenment on the Rule of Law in Contemporary China

作　　者：顾培东[1] Gu Peidong

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（法理学、法史学）》2017年第5期15-32,共18页JURISPRUDENCE AND HISTORY OF LAW

摘　　要：社会成员法治共识的缺乏,是当代中国法治进程中最值得关注的问题之一。社会成员在法治问题上的分歧,集中体现于理想主义法治观与实用主义法治观的差异。理想主义法治观可分为朴素的理想主义、偏执的理想主义和理性的理想主义三种类型;实用主义法治观可分为朴素的实用主义、放纵的实用主义和理性的实用主义三种类型。理想主义法治观与实用主义法治观的形成及分歧,与法治知识传播和交流中的智识屏障直接相关,这些智识屏障造成了社会不同层面对法治本相了解的失真,进而在一定程度上造就了法治观念的差异。为此,应通过法治的再启蒙,强化全社会对于法治基本知识或法治本相的了解与认同,并以此为基站,推动全社会法治共识的形成。One of the most noteworthy issues in the construction of the rule of law in China is the lack of consensus among members of society in the field of the rule of law.Disagreements among social members on the issue of the rule of law are embodied in a concentrated way in the conflict between two outlooks on the rule of law:idealist and pragmatist.The idealist outlook on the rule of law constitutes of three branches:simple,paranoid and rational idealist outlooks;comparably,the pragmatist outlook on the rule of law can also be divided into three branches:simple,indulgent and rational pragmatist outlooks.Intellectual barriers in social propagation and communication of legal knowledge are a direct reason of the formation of and contribute directly to the conflicts between the two different outlooks on the rule of law.These intellectual barriers distort the true features of the law-based governance,and consequently breed disagreement on the concept of the rule of law.For these reasons,it is necessary to re-enlighten the Chinese people on the rule of law,so as to deepen their understanding of the rule of law and of true features of a law-based government,which is the foundation of a social consensus on the rule of law.

关 键 词：法治观念 法治共识 法治启蒙 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]