检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王生智[1] Wang Shengzhi(Department of Journalism and Communication,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China)
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学新闻系
出 处:《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第6期97-105,共9页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“互联网与表达权的法律边界研究”(15ZDB144)阶段性成果
摘 要:警察权与公民的涉警批评权是一对价值冲突:公民对警察的批评是宪法权利,有利于监督警务活动和执法活动的公正;如果滥用批评权,则有损于警察权威,干扰警察执法,侵犯警察人格权。涉警批评要从善意动机出发,采取合法的批评方式。警察在对待批评时,应秉持谦抑原则,考虑批评者的主观动机之善恶,给予善意的关乎公共利益的批评性言论以充分的表达空间,依法限制恶意的、侮辱、诽谤、煽动性言论和行动。Police powers and citizens'rights to criticize police are a kind of conflict of values:citizens'criticism of police is a constitutional right,which should be avoided being abused.Therefore,it is important to guarantee and limit the right of criticism towards police.When criticizing police,citizens should adhere to good motivation,and choose lawful methods.When being criticized,police should stick to the principle of restraining power,distinguish between good and malicious motivations,offering freedom of well-meant criticism concerning public interests,and restrict malicious,insulting,slanderous and provocative speech and behavior according to the law.
分 类 号:D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43