输尿管软镜碎石术与微创经皮肾取石术治疗肾盏结石临床的效果比较  

Clinical anafysis of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal pelvis

作　　者：向敏[1] 任碧华[1] Xiang Min;Ren Bihua(Urology Surgery,Mianyang Central Hospital,MianyangSichuan 621000,China)

机构地区：[1]绵阳市中心医院泌尿外科,四川绵阳621000

出　　处：《医药前沿》2019年第29期121-122,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine

摘　　要：目的:比较输尿管软镜碎石术与微创经皮肾取石术治疗肾盏结石临床效果.方法:取我院肾盏结石患者120例为研究对象,随机分为研究组(输尿管软镜碎石术)与对照组(微创经皮肾取石术)各60例,比较两组疼痛阈值、生活质量、并发症发生率与有效率.结果:研究组手术时间、创口愈合时间与住院时间较对照组短,血红蛋白较对照组低,有效率较对照组高,具统计学差异(P<0.05).结论:对小于2cm肾盏结石患者采用输尿管软镜碎石术治疗能缓解疼痛程度,提高手术效果,安全性高,值得借鉴.Objective:To study the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal pelvis.Methods:120 patients with pyelonesis in our hospital were enrolled in the study.The patients were randomly divided into the study group(ureteroscopy and ureteroscopy)and the control group(minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy).The observation index,pain threshold,Quality of life,complications and effectiveness.Results:The operation time,wound healing time and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group.The hemoglobin decrease was lower than that of the control group,and the effective rate was high,P<0.05(statistical difference).Condusion:The treatment of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with pyelonesis less than 2cm can relieve pain,improve the surgical effect,and has high safety It is worth learning.

关 键 词：输尿管软镜碎石术 微创经皮肾取石术 肾盏结石 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R692.4[医药卫生—泌尿科学]