灾害史研究的自然回归及其科学转向  

Natural Regression and Scientific Turning of Disaster History Research

作　　者：卜风贤 BU Feng-xian(Northwest Institute of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学西北历史环境与经济社会发展研究院

出　　处：《河北学刊》2019年第6期73-79,共7页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2018年度国家社会科学基金项目《历史灾害书写及其文献体系研究》(18BZS154)

摘　　要：灾害史研究中人文化与非人文化倾向论争直接关系到其学科属性的认识与定位。从过去几十年的研究进展看,灾害史研究中自然科学家作了大量基础性工作,也曾经一度影响到灾害史研究的发展方向,2000年以后经过历史学家介入才有了人文社会科学与自然科学的充分交融,灾害史研究中也呈现出综合灾害史、减灾技术史、灾害文化史、灾害社会史、灾害经济史及区域灾害史等多个分支方向齐头并进的迅猛发展势头。重新检视灾害史研究的发展历程、学科基础、研究对象、研究内容等问题,并从灾害史研究所体现的自然与人文相结合、灾害与社会相关联、历史与现实相对应的学科特点出发,提出了灾害史研究本质以自然属性为主的新观点,解释了灾害史研究中非人文化倾向的论断误区。The debate on human and inhuman culture in disaster history research is directly related to the cog-nition and orientation of the discipline attributes.From the research progress over the past decades,a lot of basic work in disaster history have done by natural scientists,and which affected to the develop direction of disaster history research.After 2000,the full integration of humanities and natural sciences was achieved through the intervention of historians,disaster history studies has shown the tendency that integrated disaster history,history of disaster reduction technology,disaster culture history,disaster social history,disaster eco-nomic history and regional disaster history developed together.Reviewing the development progress,discipline foundation,research object and research content of disaster history research,from the discipline characteristics of combination of nature and humanity,disaster and society,history and reality,it puts forward a new view that disaster history research is mainly on natural attributes,and explains the misunderstanding of inhuman cultural tendency in disaster history research.

关 键 词：灾害史研究 人文化倾向 非人文化倾向 自然回归 科学转向 

分 类 号：K03[历史地理—历史学]