作为一种文学研究方法的数字人文——印刷文化基础设施，20世纪文学批评史，以及文学社会学  

Digital Humanities as a Literature Research Method:Print Culture Infrastructure,Literary Criticism in the 20th Century,and the Sociology of Literature

作　　者：姜文涛 Jiang Wentao

机构地区：[1]浙江大学国际联合学院(海宁国际校区)

出　　处：《中国比较文学》2019年第4期29-47,共19页Comparative Literature in China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于大数据技术的古代文学经典文本分析与研究(项目号:18ZDA238)”的阶段性成果

摘　　要：数字人文文学研究已经成为一种在迅速发展的文学研究方法。本文以长时段历史视野讨论"晚期人文批评"时代这一种人文学批评方法的可能性。人文学科是随着近代印刷文化的兴起而历史地产生的知识机构化形式;无论是在新批评时代,还是在批评理论盛行的时代,文学研究批评者始终承担精英主义"教导者"的角色;计算和统计的方法在文学研究中一直存在,是其近代科学化进程的一个侧面。从文学研究作为近代学科体制的建立,到数字人文作为一种方法,人文知识不断地被机构化生产和流传,始终处于知识民主化的进程中,批评者的角色不断地被赋予不同的职业形象和技能特征。本文提议重视文献文本基础设施,重视中国文学研究历史和传统的数字人文文学研究。Digital humanities has been a rising method for literary studies. This essay discusses the possibilities this method would bring to literary studies in the so-called era of late humanistic criticism from a long historical perspective. Humanities in university settings are disciplined forms of knowledge that came into being with the rise of modern print culture.The critics of literary research always have the role of elitist positions in the era of New Criticism as well as in the era of Theory. Computational and statistical methods are manifestations of the scientific dimensions in literary studies. From the beginning of literary studies as a disciplinary form of knowledge to digital humanities as one of the methods,humanities knowledge has been constantly institutionalized and disseminated,which is a process of democratization of knowledge. This essay proposes a digital humanities method in literary studies modeled on the conventional expertise of textual scholarship and on the scholarly editions immersed in the history and tradition of Chinese literary studies.

关 键 词：数字人文文学研究 印刷文化基础设施 统计方法 计量分析 晚期人文批评 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]