不同切口治疗小儿交通性鞘膜积液的临床效果  

Clinical Effects of Different Incisions in the Treatment of Communicating Hydrocele in Children

作　　者：王利 WANG Li(Children's Hospital of Sanhe City,Sanhe,Hebei 065201,China)

机构地区：[1]三河市儿童医院,河北三河065201

出　　处：《大医生》2019年第12期32-33,共2页Doctor

摘　　要：目的比较不同切口治疗小儿交通性鞘膜积液的临床效果。方法选取2017年8月至2018年8月三河市儿童医院接受治疗的交通性鞘膜积液患儿80例,回顾性分析其临床资料,按照术式分组,对照组37例采取传统腹股沟切口手术,观察组43例采取经腹横纹小切口手术,比较两组手术时间、住院时间、住院费用及术后不良事件发生率。结果观察组手术时间与住院时间明显短于对照组,住院费用少于对照组,不良事件发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论经腹横纹小切口手术治疗小儿交通性鞘膜积液安全性优于传统腹股沟切口手术。Objective To compare the clinical effects of different incisions in the treatment of communicating hydrocele of children.Methods Eighty children with communicating hydrocele who were treated in our hospital from August 2017 to August 2018 were selected as the subjects of this study.The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.According to the operation method,37 cases in the control group were treated by traditional inguinal incision operation,and 43 cases in the observation group were treated by transabdominal transverse incision operation.The operation time,hospitalization time,hospitalization expenses and incidences of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group,and the hospitalization expense and incidence of adverse events were less than those of the control group,with a significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Transabdominal transverse incision is safer than traditional inguinal incision in the treatment of communicating hydrocele in children.

关 键 词：经腹横纹小切口手术 传统腹股沟切口手术 小儿交通性鞘膜积液 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]