垂直专业化分工抑制了中国制造业增加值率吗?  

Does Vertical Specialization Division Restrain the Value-Added Rate of China’s Manufacturing Industry?

作　　者：霍经纬[1] 田成诗[1] HUO Jingwei;TIAN Chengshi(Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116021)

机构地区：[1]东北财经大学统计学院

出　　处：《首都经济贸易大学学报》2019年第6期19-26,共8页Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于增加值率的中国经济增长质量研究”(14ZDB130)

摘　　要：利用2003-2014年中国制造业行业面板数据,在增加值率和垂直专业化水平的测算基础上,对垂直专业化分工是否影响中国制造业增加值率进行检验,并对抑制中国增加值率的关键因素进行分析。结果显示,制造业垂直专业化分工对中国增加值率具有负向作用,但并不稳定;在引入外资影响和研发水平因素后,垂直专业化对增加值率的负向影响减弱甚至消失。此外,垂直专业化水平并不是抑制中国制造业增加值率的主要因素;外资进入中国市场,利用中国低廉的劳动力与优惠条件,垄断并限制高端产品技术与专利权,挤出中国研发部门人力资本水平,使中国垂直专业化技术进步迟滞,才是抑制中国制造业增加值率的主要原因。This paper uses the panel data of China’s manufacturing industry from 2003 to 2014 to test whether the vertical specialization affects China’s value-added rate based on the calculation of the value-added rate and the vertical specialization,and also analyzes the key factors which restrains the value-added rate.The results show that the vertical specialization of the manufacturing industry has a negative but unstable effect on China’s value-added rate.After the introduction of foreign investment and R&D factors,the negative impact of vertical specialization on the value-added rate is weakened or even disappeared.Besides,the level of vertical specialization is not the main factor that inhibits the value-added rate of China’s manufacturing industry.Foreign capital entering the Chinese market,using China’s low labor force and preferential conditions,monopolizing and restricting the high-end product technology and patent rights,and squeezing out human capital in China’s R&D department,making technological progress of China’s vertical specialization lag behind,are the main reasons for restraining the value-added rate of China’s manufacturing industry.

关 键 词：增加值率 垂直专业化 垂直专业化分工 制造业 外商投资 

分 类 号：F222[经济管理—国民经济]