检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向成林 冯仁 米元元 黄海燕[1] 胡恩华 庞志强[1] 明耀辉 XIANG Chenglin;FENG Ren;MI Yuanyuan;HUANG Haiyan;HU Enhua;PANG Zhiqiang;MING Yaohui(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China;Department of Neurosurgery,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院重症医学科,武汉430022 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院神经外科
出 处:《中国临床护理》2019年第6期516-518,共3页Chinese Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的研究床旁超声引导外周静脉穿刺在ICU静脉穿刺困难患者的应用效果。方法选取2018年6-9月我院ICU外周静脉穿刺困难的患者60例,将患者按照床号的奇偶数分为对照组和观察组,观察组36例,对照组24例。观察组采用床旁超声引导外周静脉穿刺法;对照组采用传统盲穿法。结果观察组首次穿刺成功率高于对照组(χ^2=7.656,P=0.006)、疼痛评分低于对照组(t=4.989,P<0.001)。结论床旁超声引导外周静脉穿刺提升了ICU静脉穿刺患者首次穿刺成功率,减轻了穿刺疼痛程度。Objective To study the effect of applying bedside ultrasound-guided peripheral venipuncture of ICU patients.Methods Totally 60 ICU patients difficult to implement peripheral venipuncture and admitted between June and September 2018 were selected.According to the odd and even number of their bed numbers,they were randomly divided into a control group(n=36)and an observation group(n=24).The observation group was guided by bedside ultrasound,while the control group was treated with traditional freehand cannulation.Results The one-time success rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(χ^2=7.656,P=0.006),while the pain score of the former was significantly lower than the latter(t=4.989,P<0.001).Conclusion The bedside ultrasound-guided peripheral venipuncture is superior to the traditional freehand cannulation in promoting the one-time success rate and relieving pain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68