检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷俊[1] YIN Jun(Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang,Jiangsu 212001,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属医院
出 处:《大医生》2019年第3期149-150,共2页Doctor
摘 要:目的 观察对心肺复苏患者实施急诊护理干预的效果。方法 选取2016年1月至2018年4月江苏大学附属医院90例心肺复苏患者分为观察组(45例,应用急诊护理)、对照组(45例,应用常规护理)。比较两组患者的SAS(焦虑)评分、SDS(抑郁)评分、格拉斯哥昏迷评分及住院时间。结果 观察组护理后SAS评分、SDS评分均低于对照组(P <0.05);观察组护理后格拉斯哥昏迷评分高于对照组,且住院时间低于对照组(P <0.05)。结论 对心肺复苏患者实施急诊护理十分可行,效果较佳。Objective To observe the effect of emergency nursing intervention on patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods Ninety patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation in our hospital from January 2016 to April 2018 were randomly divided into observation group(45 cases,emergency nursing)and control group(45 cases,routine nursing).The SAS(anxiety)score,SDS(depression)score,Glasgow coma score and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.Results The scores of SAS and SDS in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05),and the Glasgow coma score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the hospitalization time was shorter than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Emergency nursing for patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation is feasible and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28