检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李肖含 LI Xiao-han(Graduate school Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Beijing 102488,China)
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院研究生院
出 处:《兰州文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2019年第6期84-88,共5页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:大革命失败后的"中国社会史论战",是马克思主义唯物史观在中国传播的重要事件。长期以来,研究者强调论战的意识形态之争,却遮蔽了论战发生的学术逻辑。事实上,晚清以来传统学术研究方法的变革与转换,是马克思主义唯物史观在当时得以广泛传播的重要原因。革命运动低谷期出现了革命理论传播的高潮,看似矛盾,实则有其自身发展演变的内在必然逻辑。"The Debate on Chinese Social History" after the failure of the Great Revolution was an important event for the spread of Marxist historical materialism in China. For a long time, researchers had emphasized the ideological battle of controversy, but they had obscured the academic logic of the controversy. In fact, the reform and transformation of traditional academic research methods since the late Qing Dynasty was an important reason for the wide spread of Marxist historical materialism at that time. In the low period of the revolutionary movement, there was a climax of the spread of revolutionary theory, which seemed contradictory, but actually had its own inherent logic of development and evolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49