检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张鸣 ZHANG Ming(International Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学国际法学院
出 处:《河南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第5期31-36,共6页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基 金:2017年度北京仲裁委员会科研基金重点项目:海牙《选择法院协议公约》对国际商事仲裁的影响研究(2017-10)
摘 要:从2015年《选择法院协议公约》生效后诉讼与仲裁在国际民商事争议解决中可能发生的管辖冲突角度,研究了《公约》对法治全球治理的影响。《公约》易使管辖协议的“双重选择”问题引发复杂的平行程序和冲突性裁决,并加剧裁判竞争,助长诉讼策略的滥用,从而降低执行效率;《公约》并没有充分解决诉讼、仲裁的管辖冲突问题,限制了其在国际司法合作上的影响力。由于《公约》在国际司法领域的这种不确定性,不仅国际诉讼难以冲击国际商事仲裁的优势地位,法治全球治理效果也得不到有效的提升。It is discussed in this article that since the Convention on the Choice of Court Agreements came into force in 2015,it has an impact on global governance in terms of the rule of law,from the perspective of possible jurisdictional conflicts between international litigation and arbitration in civil and commercial dispute settlement.The conclusion is drawn that the double choices of jurisdiction protocols of the Convention are prone to complicated parallel procedures and conflicting rulings,which then aggravates the judging competition and abuses the litigation tactics,thus lowering the efficiency of enforcement.The Convention does not adequately solve the jurisdictional conflicts between international litigations and arbitrations,which restricts the international judicial cooperation.Due to the uncertainties of the Convention in international law enforcement,the international litigation can hardly play its role in competition with international commercial arbitration.And global governance in terms of the rule of law can hardly improve effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49