检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李中建[1] 刘晨辰 LI Zhongjian;LIU Chenchen(Business School,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学商学院
出 处:《河南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第5期50-57,共8页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基 金:2017年河南省教育科学规划重大招标课题((2017)-JKGHZDZB-02)
摘 要:因民众民主意识觉醒、福利呼声强、思想流派传承以及周边国家福利的良好发展态势等原因,诸多国家选择了高福利建设并逐步构建了高福利体制。然而高福利在促进社会稳定的同时,因其刚性、高依赖性、高税收等固有特性,造成了财政入不敷出、民众工作意向低、投资挤出等困境。在福利建设方面我们要以福利国家为鉴戒,防止“福利陷阱”,学习其他国家在福利建设方面的经验,发展中国特色福利体系。在措施上,我国应把握“精准扶贫精准脱贫”基本方略;完善税制结构,合理减税;引导监管机构高效参与福利建设。Many countries choose to build a high welfare system gradually,due to various factors including the awakening of the national consciousness,people’s strong appeal for welfare,the spread of social ideology and good welfare development of surrounding countries.Despite its advantage to promote social stability,high social welfare,due to its rigidity,high dependence and high taxation,has resulted in predicaments such as fiscal deficit,low working intention among the public,and crowding-out effect of investment.In view of Chinese welfare construction,lessons should be learned from those countries to avoid the welfare trap,obtain the experience of welfare development in various international cases,and develop the welfare system with Chinese characteristics.Measures should be taken to seize the opportunity of targeted poverty alleviation,improve the structure of taxation system and reduce taxes reasonably,and incorporate the supervising institutions to participate effectively in welfare construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179