学术研究的非同行评议问题及对策  

Non-peer review of academic researches and countermeasures

作　　者：李飞[1] 李达军 刘茜[1] Li Fei;Li Dajun;Liu Qian(School of Economics and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学经济管理学院

出　　处：《科研管理》2019年第11期285-288,共4页Science Research Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目:“中国百货商店演化轨迹及未来走向研究”(10BJY086);清华大学经济管理学院中国零售中心项目:“中国零售业态适应和成长问题研究”(100004002)

摘　　要：同行评议一直是学术界讨论的热点话题,但是在同行评议中普遍存在着非同行评议现象,这个现象没有受到学者们的应有重视。因此,针对这一现象,本文研究并回答了3个方面的问题:首先,非同行评议是不可避免的吗?其次,非同行评议带来的主要问题是什么?最后,如何成为一个优秀的非同行评议人?Peer review stays a hot topic in scholarly discussions of the mechanism of academic appraisal. However,review by"non-peer",which is actually widely practiced in peer review process,has not been granted sufficient attention. In response to this phenomenon,we raise and address the following three questions here: first,could we effectively avoid review by non-peers?second,what are the major drawbacks of this alternative to peer review in a strict sense? And third,what we might do to become a"good"non-peer reviewer?For a long time,the academic community has not stopped asking questions about peer review,but there is no better way to replace it. Therefore,scholars have been paying attention to improving peer review methods,such as the characteristics of good peer reviewers? How to screen out a good peer reviewer? And how to control the unfair behavior of peer reviewers? These studies are very meaningful,but in many cases,we cannot find the true peers of the review anyway,so some American scholars say that peer review is"a science that is difficult to have peers". That is to say,although we are collectively referred to as peer review when we are reviewing scientific research topics and research results,in fact,there are a large number of non-peer reviews in many situations. Therefore,paying attention to and discussing the phenomenon of non-peer reviewers is an issue that cannot be ignored in ensuring the quality and effectiveness of the review.The"peer"in the peer review,the English word is"Peer",which means people with the same qualifications and abilities.British scholars Gibbon and George believe that"peer review is a synonym for the scientific value of research work in this field by scientists in the field or scientists in the vicinity". If the"area"in the definition is identified as a peer,then"proximity"or"equivalent,same ability"is considered to be a quasi-peer or non-peer. Therefore,although we strive to make peer review a reality,non-peer review becomes an inevitable universal phenomenon due to the ambiguity o

关 键 词：同行评议 匿名评审 学术评价 

分 类 号：G311.0[文化科学] N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]