检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王志祥 WANG Zhixiang(College for Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院
出 处:《法学论坛》2019年第6期135-141,共7页Legal Forum
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目《我国刑法修正的理论模型与制度实践研究》(16ZDA061)的阶段性成果
摘 要:维稳观念的不当贯彻,导致正当防卫的成立空间在司法实务中被大大地压缩,正当防卫的规定由此沦为"沉睡的规定"或"僵尸条款"。因此,对正当防卫制度的司法适用亟待进行纠偏。但是,对正当防卫制度司法适用的纠偏应当是以保证《刑法》中正当防卫的规定得到正确适用为前提的。从目前的情况来看,在实务和理论两个层面均存在着对正当防卫制度司法适用的"过正"纠偏现象:从实务的层面来看,存在着将正当防卫与事后防卫进行混同的问题;从理论的层面来看,则存在着将防卫过当与正当防卫进行混同的问题。这不适当地扩大了正当防卫制度的司法适用空间。为此,对正当防卫制度的司法适用有必要进行再度纠偏。The improper implementation of the concept of maintaining stability has resulted in the fact that the establishment space of justifiable defense is greatly compressed in the judicial practice.Thus the provisions of justifiable defense are reduced to"sleeping provisions"or"zombie clauses".Therefore,the judicial application of the system of justifiable defense needs to be rectified urgently.However,to rectify the judicial application of the system of justifiable defense should be based on ensuring the correct application of the provisions of justifiable defense in the criminal Law.Judged from the current situation,as far as the judicial application of the system of justifiable defense is concerned,excessive rectifications exist:in the practical level,the justifiable defense is confused with the afterwards defense;in the theoretical level,justifiable defense is confused with excessive defense.Thus the judicial applicable space of the system of justifiable defense is expanded inappropriately.In view of these phenomena,it is necessary to rectify the judicial application of the system of justifiable defense again.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.254.100