考虑不同阶段融资的再制造产品回收定价决策  

Remanufactured Products’ Recycling Pricing Strategy Considering Financing at Different Stages

作　　者：李倩茹 陈伟达[1] 杨烨[1] Li Qianru;Chen Weida;Yang Ye(School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学经济管理学院

出　　处：《统计与决策》2019年第20期41-45,共5页Statistics & Decision

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目（71571042;71271054;71501046)

摘　　要：针对再制造企业中存在的回收条件不确定和资金约束等情况,文章考虑了在一个单周期环境下,再制造商回收和再制造两种不同质量等级的废旧产品,并满足相同的市场需求,讨论再制造商在回收期或生产期内应如何决策最优的回收定价、融资模式、融资金额等问题,并建立了相应的非线性规划模型和数值仿真算例。研究结果表明,再制造商可以根据初始资金、回收系数及再制造成本差异等参数选择合理的融资模式并确定最优的回收价格、回收数量,从而有效提高企业收益。此外,对制造企业来说融资模式对产品回收定价和系统利润都有较深远的影响。In view of the uncertainty of recycling conditions and capital constraints in remanufacturing enterprises, this paper considers that in a single-cycle environment, remanufacturers recycle and reproduce two kinds of waste or worn-out products of different quality grades, and meet the same market demand. The paper also discusses how remanufacturers should determine the optimal recycling pricing, financing mode, financing amount, etc. during the recycling period or production period, and establishes the corresponding nonlinear programming model and numerical simulation examples. The research results show that remanufacturers can select a reasonable financing mode according to such parameters as initial capital, recycling coefficient and the difference of remanufacturing cost, to determine the optimal recycling price and recycling quantity, thus effectively improving corporate earnings. In addition, for manufacturing enterprises, financing mode has a far-reaching impact on product recycling pricing and system profits.

关 键 词：生产周期 回收定价 质量差异 资金约束 融资模式 

分 类 号：F722.3[经济管理—产业经济]