检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴宇 詹丽[1] Wu Yu;Zhan Li(School of Economics and Management,Three Gorges University,Yichang,Hubei 443002,China)
机构地区:[1]三峡大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《大庆师范学院学报》2019年第6期113-119,共7页Journal of Daqing Normal University
摘 要:从会计准则制定依据和监督机制角度出发,比较我国会计准则制定模式与美国会计准则制定模式并分析两者之间存在的差异。同时,针对会计准则国际趋同背景下我国会计准则制定模式,特别是制定过程的监督与信息反馈这两方面,提出切实有效的优化建议举措。最后立足于我国宏观发展环境,结合中美两国文化差异,在符合中国国情的前提下,借鉴美国会计准则制定模式的优点,推进我国会计准则制定过程向透明化与应用便捷化转变。This paper compares the Chinese accounting standards formulation model and American accounting standards formulation model from the perspective of accounting standards formulation and supervision mechanism,and analyzes the differences between the United States and China.At the same time,in view of the convergence of accounting standards which includes Chinaaccounting standards formulation model,especially in the formulation process of supervision and information feedback,providing practical and effective suggestions and measures.At the end of the paper,based on China's macro-development environment,combined with the cultural differences between China and the United States,on the premise of national conditions,we can learn from the American accounting standards formulation model to optimize our accounting standards formulation model and promote the transparency and convenient application of our accounting standards formulation process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15