检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁宇[1] 姜丹 DING Yu;JIANG Dan(School of Economics,Literature and Law/MSW Education Center,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065;School of Economics,Literature and Law,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉科技大学文法与经济学院社会工作专业硕士(MSW)教育中心
出 处:《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第6期150-155,共6页Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“国家能力视角下群团组织与民间社会组织的竞合关系研究”(17BSH108);湖北省教育厅重点项目“新时代中国枢纽型社会组织与政府关系研究”(19D019)
摘 要:我国公民网络问责对地方政府传统公共决策模式提出了挑战。地方政府处置失当极易引发公共决策困境,甚至导致公共安全事件。若干典型案例表明,公共决策困境中的公众网络参与逻辑如下:公民网络参与是公共决策合法性的重要来源;网络舆论失控是公共决策困境的重要原因;理性的公民网络参与有助于走出公共决策困境。为此,在网络信息时代,地方政府要走出公共决策困境,其对策思路如下:确立多元化民主参与理念、确保公共决策中公民充分而有效的参与、重建地方政府的网络舆论话语权和提升网络治理能力等。As a new form of public decision,network accountability puts forward new requirements for the local governments in the traditional mode of public decision.The improper response to network accountability may lead to public crises and security problems.Some typical cases illustrate that citizen's participation via network in the public decision-making can be realized in rules listed as below:citizen's participation via network is an important source of legitimacy for public decision-making;incontrollable network public opinions may cause public decision-making crisis;citizen's rational participation is helpful for getting rid of public decision-making predicament.In the age of network and information,local governments determining to get out of the public decision-making predicament should take the following countermeasures:more pluralistic democratic participation,more effective citizenship participation,stronger dominance on discourse power and higher network governance capabilities of local governments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222